Why the study?
The polio endgame remains complicated, leaving many questions about future polio vaccines and national immunization policies.
Do alternative polio vaccine routine immunization policies (such as adding IPV doses) improve health and economic outcomes compared to reference scenarios?
Do alternative polio vaccine routine immunization policies (such as adding IPV doses) improve health and economic outcomes compared to reference scenarios?
Adding a second dose of IPV to routine immunization is economically justified only if all wild poliovirus eradication is achieved, emphasizing the high costs associated with OPV restarts.
Modeling informs polio vaccine policy options by income level; leaves open optimal eradication strategies pending empirical validation.
The polio endgame remains complicated, with many questions about future polio vaccines and national immunization policies. We simulated possible future poliovirus vaccine routine immunization policies for countries stratified by World Bank Income Levels and estimated the expected costs and cases using an updated integrated dynamic poliovirus transmission, stochastic risk, and economic model. We consider two reference cases scenarios: one that achieves the eradication of all wild polioviruses (WPVs) by 2023 and one in which serotype 1 WPV (WPV1) transmission continues. The results show that the addition of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) to routine immunization in all countries substantially increased the expected costs of the polio endgame, without substantially increasing its expected health or economic benefits. Adding a second dose of IPV to the routine immunization schedules of countries that currently include a single IPV dose further increases costs and does not appear economically justified in the reference case that does not stop WPV transmission. For the reference case that includes all WPV eradication, adding a second IPV dose at the time of successful oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) cessation represents a cost-effective option. The risks and costs of needing to restart OPV use change the economics of the polio endgame, although the time horizon used for modeling impacts the overall economic results. National health leaders will want to consider the expected health and economic net benefits of their national polio vaccine strategies recognizing that preferred strategies may differ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalkowska et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: