Key result
Nontraditional biomarkers may improve cardiovascular risk stratification when added to existing risk algorithms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) disease depends on the capacity to identify subjects at higher risk long before the occurrence of CV clinical manifestations. Traditional risk factors do not cover fully prediction of individual risk. Moreover, there is an area of gray for patients at intermediate CV risk, which offers wide margins of improvement. These observations highlight the need for new additive tools for a more accurate risk stratification. An increasing number of candidate biomarkers have been identified to predict CV risk and events, although they generally give only a moderate increase when added to currently available predictive scores. The approach utilizing a relative small number of biomarkers in multiple combinations, but only weakly related to each other or unrelated, thus belonging to independent-pathways, and so able to catch the multidimensional characteristic of atherosclerosis, appears promising. We discuss vitamin D and bone turnover biomarkers, hepatitis C virus, and psycho-emotional factors that may reflect alternative pathways over those generally considered for atherosclerosis (e.g., aspects directly related to inflammation and thrombosis). These new biomarkers could facilitate a more accurate assessment of CV risk stratification if incorporated in the current risk assessment algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Traghella et al. (2018) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease risk and atherosclerosis. Nontraditional cardiovascular biomarkers and risk factors (vitamin D, bone turnover biomarkers, hepatitis C virus, psycho-emotional factors) vs. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and current predictive scores was evaluated on Cardiovascular risk and events. Nontraditional biomarkers (vitamin D, bone turnover, hepatitis C virus, psycho-emotional factors) may improve cardiovascular risk stratification when added to current risk algorithms.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: