Why the study?
Do ACE inhibitors alter venous responsiveness to angiotensin I and bradykinin in healthy subjects?
Do ACE inhibitors alter venous responsiveness to angiotensin I and bradykinin in healthy subjects?
ACE inhibitors demonstrate rapid in vivo inhibition of angiotensin I metabolism and potentiation of bradykinin venodilation in human veins.
Supports ACE inhibitor mechanisms in human veins; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II likely occurs in human veins, supporting the existence of endothelial angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity in these vessels. Using the dorsal hand vein technique, we investigated the effects of 2 ACE inhibitors, captopril (single oral dose of 6.25 mg) and enalaprilat (local infusion of 1 microgram/min), on venous responsiveness in healthy subjects. Orally administered captopril induced a marked decrease in angiotensin I- but not angiotensin II-induced venoconstriction. This blunted response persisted for at least 4 hours. Enalaprilat and captopril increased the sensitivity to bradykinin, decreasing the dose producing half-maximal response (ED50) of bradykinin 18-fold and 5-fold, respectively, without changing the maximal venodilatory response. These results confirm that there is substantial rapid metabolism of angiotensin I in human veins and suggest that a single dose of locally infused angiotensin I can be used with the dorsal hand vein technique to assess the time-course effect of vascular ACE inhibition after oral administration. Our findings also extend previous in vitro observations in human veins by showing that these agents potentiate the venodilatory effects of bradykinin in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chalon et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: