Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of misplaced hold-downs on the monotonic and cyclic behavior of wood shear walls. Three shear wall configurations were considered: (1) walls with hold-downs at the ends; (2) walls with one misplaced hold-down to the first interior stud; and (3) walls with misplaced hold-downs plus additional nailing applied to the stud attached to misplaced hold-downs. Results showed that misplaced hold-downs cause reductions in strength and absorbed energy. Specimens with misplaced hold-downs achieved strength values 42% lower under monotonic loading and 35% lower under cyclic loading when compared to the specimens with hold-downs at the ends. Specimens with misplaced hold-downs plus additional nailing reached an average strength that was 21% lower under monotonic loading and 19% lower under cyclic loading when compared to the specimens with hold-downs at the ends. Denser nail spacing applied to the stud with misplaced hold-downs significantly increased the amount of energy absorbed by the shear walls. The monotonic and cyclic test results showed that misplaced hold-downs have detrimental effects on the structural performance of wood shear walls. Application of denser nail spacing can help such walls regain strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lebeda et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: