Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Photocatalytic reduction of methyl viologen (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium mv2+) was efficiently carried out with copper(I) complexes [Cu(dmphen)L2]+[dmphen = 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, L = PPhn(C6H4OMe-p)3 –n, n= 0–3] upon irradiation of the metal-o-ligand charge-transfer band at around 360 nm. The quantum yield for reduction, φ(mv˙+), increases considerably in the order L = PPh3 PPh2-(C6H4OMe-p) < PPh(C6H4OMe-p)2 < P(C6H4OMe-p)3, i.e. in increasing order of the phosphine donation ability. The best quantum yield (0.1) was recorded when [Cu(dmphen){P(C6H4OMe-p)3}2]+ was used. Kinetic analysis and measurement of the lifetime of the excited copper(I) complex revealed the reason why φ(mv˙+) increases as the phosphine donation ability increases: first, the excited state becomes longer-lived and secondly, the charge-separation step becomes easier with increasing donation ability. The significant phosphine effects on the excited-state lifetime are discussed in terms of the solvent interaction with the copper(I) centre.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakaki et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: