Why the study?
Pregestational diabetes increases the risk of vascular complications and preeclampsia, and it was unknown whether corin could predict preeclampsia in this high-risk group.
Does serum corin concentration predict preeclampsia in pregnant women with long-term pregestational type 1 diabetes?
Does serum corin concentration predict preeclampsia in pregnant women with long-term pregestational type 1 diabetes?
Serum corin assessment at mid-gestation may serve as an early predictor of preeclampsia in high-risk patients with pregestational type 1 diabetes.
Corin may aid PE prediction in PGDM; leaves open integration into risk calculators pending prospective validation.
Preeclampsia (PE) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in pregnant women. Pregestational diabetes (PGDM) patients are prone to vascular complications and preeclampsia, whereas vascular exposure to hyperglycemia induces inflammation, vascular remodeling, and arterial stiffness. Corin is a serine protease, converting inactive pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (pro-ANP) into an active form. It also promotes salt and water excretion by activating atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), and significantly increases trophoblast invasion. The study aimed to determine whether corin may be a predictor of PE in a high-risk group-women with long-term PGDM. The nested case-control prospective study involved 63 patients with long-term pregestational type 1 diabetes (PGDM). In total, 17 patients developed preeclampsia (the study group), whereas 43 patients without PE constituted the control group. To assess corin concentration, blood samples were collected at two time points: between 18th-22nd week of gestation and 28th-32nd week of gestation. PE patients presented significantly higher mid-gestation corin levels, urine protein loss in each trimester, serum creatinine in the third trimester, and lower creatinine clearance in the third trimester. The results of our study indicate that serum corin assessment may play a role in predicting preeclampsia. Thus, it may be included in the PE risk calculator, initially in high-risk groups, such as patients with PGDM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boroń et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: