Key result
Carotid endarterectomy yields an absolute ~5.5% reduction in 5-year nonperioperative stroke vs medical therapy.
Meta-Analysis (n=5,223)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of ischemic strokes are caused by carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Estimated prevalence of asymptomatic CAS is 1%. PURPOSE: To evaluate evidence on screening and treating asymptomatic adults for CAS. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and trial registries through September 2013; MEDLINE through March 2014 for trials. STUDY SELECTION: Good- or fair-quality trials of screening, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), or stenting compared with medical therapy or of intensification of medical therapy; systematic reviews; multi-institution studies reporting harms; and externally validated risk-stratification tools. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual extraction and quality assessment. DATA SYNTHESIS: No trials compared screening with no screening or stenting with medical therapy or assessed intensification of medical therapy, and no externally validated, reliable risk-stratification tools were found. Given the specificity of ultrasonography (range, 88% to 94% for CAS ≥ 50% to ≥ 70%), its use in low-prevalence populations would yield many false-positive results. Absolute reduction of nonperioperative strokes was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.9% to 7.0%; 3 trials; 5223 participants) over approximately 5 years for CEA compared with medical therapy. The 30-day rates of stroke or death after CEA in trials and cohort studies were 2.4% (CI, 1.7% to 3.1%; 6 trials; 3435 participants) and 3.3% (CI, 2.7% to 3.9%; 7 studies; 17474 participants), respectively. Other harms of interventions included myocardial infarction, nerve injury, and hematoma. LIMITATIONS: Trials may have overestimated benefits and used highly selected surgeons. Medical therapy used in trials was outdated, and stroke rates have declined in recent decades. Harms may have been underreported. CONCLUSION: Current evidence does not establish incremental overall benefit of CEA, stenting, or intensification of medical therapy. Potential for overall benefit is limited by low prevalence and harms. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonas et al. (2014) conducted a meta-analysis in Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (n=5,223). Screening, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), or stenting vs. No screening or medical therapy was evaluated on Nonperioperative stroke (ARR 5.5%, 95% CI 3.9%-7.0%). Carotid endarterectomy vs medical therapy reduced nonperioperative strokes by 5.5% (95% CI, 3.9%-7.0%) over 5 years, with 2.4%-3.3% 30-day stroke or death rates.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: