Why the study?
Does contrast echocardiography improve left ventricular endocardial border visualization and interpretation confidence compared to noncontrast echocardiography in adult patients with clinical indications for contrast?
Does contrast echocardiography improve left ventricular endocardial border visualization and interpretation confidence compared to noncontrast echocardiography in adult patients with clinical indications for contrast?
Contrast echocardiography significantly improves left ventricular endocardial border visualization and physician interpretation confidence in patients with technically difficult baseline images.
Retrospective data suggest improved border definition with contrast; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Purpose There is much evidence-based research proving the effectiveness of contrast echocardiography, but there are still questions and concerns about its specific uses. This study tested the effectiveness of contrast echocardiography in defining the left ventricular endocardial border. Methods From 30 patients, a total of 60 echocardiograms –– 30 with and 30 without use of contrast –– were retrospectively reviewed by four blinded cardiologists with advanced training in echocardiography. No single cardiologist reviewed contrast and noncontrast images of the same patient. Each set of 30 echocardiograms was then studied for wall-motion scoring. Visualization of left ventricular wall segments and a global visualization confidence level of interpretation were recorded. Results Of all wall segments (N = 510), 91% were visualized in echocardiograms with use of contrast, whereas 75% of the walls were visualized in echocardiograms without contrast (P < 0.001). Of 30 examinations, 17 contrast echocardiograms were read with high confidence compared to 6 without contrast use (P = 0.004). The number of walls visualized with contrast was increased in 18 patients (60%), whereas noncontrast echocardiograms yielded more visualized walls in 6 patients (20%, P = 0.002). Conclusions This study demonstrates that contrast is valuable to echocardiographic imaging. Its use should be supported throughout echocardiography clinics and encouraged in certain patients for whom resting and stress echocardiography results without contrast often prove uninterpretable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Treiber et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: