In spite of considerable uncertainty reported on the impact of Combined Sewer Overflows (CSO), it is generally acknowledged to not be negligible. Not surprisingly CSO impact is considered – although indirectly – in driving European legislations regarding the wastewater pollution and treatment. Still, when looking at impact reduction, policy makers tend to resort rather to static solutions such as disconnection or the building of storage tanks. On the other hand they often seem to be put off by dynamic measures such as Real Time Control (RTC) of sewage systems because of its perceived complexity. This paper describes a cost-benefit analysis of several static and dynamic solutions to mitigate CSO impact, based on the case-study of the Kessel-Lo catchment in Flanders/Belgium. RTC turned out to be not only the most cost efficient measure for CSO impact mitigation but also the solution offering the most flexibility for further system upgrade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dirckx et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: