Why the study?
The acute effects of autoregulated versus non-autoregulated applied pressures during blood flow restriction resistance exercise to volitional fatigue on arterial stiffness were unknown.
Does autoregulated blood flow restriction prevent acute increases in arterial stiffness compared to non-autoregulated or no blood flow restriction during low-load resistance exercise in physically active adults?
Does autoregulated blood flow restriction prevent acute increases in arterial stiffness compared to non-autoregulated or no blood flow restriction during low-load resistance exercise in physically active adults?
Autoregulated blood flow restriction during low-load resistance exercise mitigates the acute increases in central arterial stiffness observed with non-autoregulated or non-restricted exercise.
Autoregulated BFR may avoid acute arterial stiffness changes; leaves open differential vascular effects versus non-autoregulated pressures in larger trials.
This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of autoregulated and non-autoregulated applied pressures during blood flow restriction resistance exercise to volitional fatigue on indices of arterial stiffness using the Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System. Following a randomized autoregulated or non-autoregulated blood flow restriction familiarization session, 20 physically active adults (23±5 years; 7 females) participated in three randomized treatment-order sessions with autoregulated and non-autoregulated and no blood flow restriction training. Participants performed four sets of dumbbell wall squats to failure using 20% of one repetition maximum. Blood flow restriction was performed with 60% of supine limb occlusion pressure. Testing before and post-session included an ultrasonic scan of the carotid artery, applanation tonometry, and blood pressure acquisition.Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity increased in the non-autoregulated and no blood flow restriction training groups following exercise while carotid-radial pulse wave velocity increased in the no blood flow restriction training group (all p<0.05). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity exhibited an interaction effect between autoregulated and non-autoregulated blood flow restriction in favor of autoregulated blood flow restriction (p<0.05). Autoregulated blood flow restriction training does not influence indices of arterial stiffness while non-autoregulated and no blood flow restriction training increases central stiffness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rolnick et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: