Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose According to the global standard set by Financial Action Task Force (FATF), all countries are requested to develop an effective financial intelligence supply chain involving Financial Institutions (FIs), Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) and Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) to cope with money laundering, terror financing and financial sanctions circumventions. The main purpose of this paper is to explore how different players approach innovation and which are their innovation priorities. The work provides theoretical framework and practical indications disclosing insights coming from the Innovation Working Group (IWG) of Europol Financial Intelligence Public-Private Partnership (EFIPPP). Design/methodology/approach This paper draws on original research conducted inside EFIPPP’s IWG, leveraging the contributions of 44 people from 21 countries, including AML-obliged reporting entities, FIs, FIUs, LEAs, Research Institutes, and International Organizations. Findings The research outlines innovation practices that financial intelligence players adopt to address operational challenges. The aim is to identify technological solutions (demand-pull) and/or integrate technological innovations that impact their operational domain (technology-push). The results show 19 key innovations perceived as significant priorities. Research limitations/implications The study involved only participants and countries from the IWG, as it is an outcome of the EFIPPP initiative. While the focus is primarily – though not exclusively – on EU countries, the participants represent stakeholders from each stage of the financial intelligence supply chain, helping to overcome silos between the public and private sectors. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no study has specifically focused on innovation practices and priorities in financial intelligence, considering the different perspectives of FIs, FIUs and LEAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moncalvo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: