Why the study?
Conventional treatments for cardiac tachyarrhythmia have limitations and risks, whereas adeno-associated virus-mediated gene therapy represents a promising potential treatment option needing an updated overview.
Does AAV-mediated gene therapy reduce arrhythmia inducibility in preclinical models of cardiac tachyarrhythmia?
Does AAV-mediated gene therapy reduce arrhythmia inducibility in preclinical models of cardiac tachyarrhythmia?
AAV-mediated gene therapy significantly reduces the inducibility of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in preclinical animal models, highlighting a promising future therapeutic avenue.
AAV gene therapy reduced arrhythmia inducibility in preclinical models; leaves open clinical translation pending human trials.
Cardiac tachyarrhythmia presents a significant health care challenge, causing notable morbidity and mortality. Conventional treatments have limitations and potential risks, resulting in an elevated disease burden. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene therapy holds promise as a potential future treatment option. Therefore, we aimed to provide a measured overview of the latest developments in this rapidly growing field. PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to January 2024. Studies that employed AAV as a vector for delivery of therapeutic agents to treat cardiac tachyarrhythmia were included. Of the 26 studies included, 20 published in the last 5 years. There were 22 novel molecular targets identified. More than 80% of the included studies employed small-animal models or used AAV9. In atrial fibrillation preclinical studies, AAV-mediated gene therapy reduced atrial fibrillation inducibility by 81% (odds ratio, 0.19 [0.08-0.45]; P < .01). Similarly, for acquired and inherited ventricular arrhythmia, animal models receiving gene therapy had less inducible ventricular arrhythmia (odds ratio, 0.06 [0.03-0.11]; P < .01). This review highlights the rapid progress of AAV-mediated gene therapy for cardiac tachyarrhythmia. Although these investigations are currently in the early stages of clinical application, they present promising prospects for gene therapy. (PROSPERO registry: CRD42023479448).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mundisugih et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: