Why the study?
Data characterizing left ventricular geometry are scarce in male Black athletes and even more limited in female Black athletes.
Does black ethnicity influence left ventricular geometry and relative wall thickness in athletes compared to white athletes?
Does black ethnicity influence left ventricular geometry and relative wall thickness in athletes compared to white athletes?
This study aims to derive ethnicity-specific normative values for relative wall thickness to help differentiate physiological left ventricular hypertrophy from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in black athletes.
May increase HCM misdiagnosis risk in BAs; leaves open need for ethnicity-specific screening criteria.
Ethnicity is a major determinant of cardiac adaptation to exercise. Black athletes (BAs) demonstrate more profound electrical and structural changes than white athletes (WAs), which manifest on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram.1,2 It is well established that BAs develop greater left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in response to exercise, compared to WAs, creating a larger overlap between physiology and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The issue is further compounded by the fact that BAs are at increased risk of exercise-related sudden cardiac death (SCD) with HCM accounting for a significant proportion of cases.3 The growing number of elite black sportsmen and women has intensified efforts to correctly identify those at risk. Left ventricular (LV) geometry has been postulated as a more accurate tool compared to absolute LV wall thickness in differentiating physiological LV hypertrophy from HCM. Although LV geometry has been well characterized in WAs,4 there is a paucity of data in male BAs and even less data in female BAs. This study aimed to establish the influence of black ethnicity on LV geometry and to derive ethnicity-specific normative values for relative wall thickness (RWT).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: