Key result
Black athlete ancestry is linked to marked cardiac adaptation, with LV wall thickness >12 mm in ~7%.
Why the study?
Race-based screening criteria in sports cardiology assume biological distinctions that may not reflect physiological reality, prompting evaluation of whether geographic ancestry provides more clinically relevant predictors.
Does geographic ancestry provide more clinically relevant predictors of cardiac adaptation than racial categorization in athletes?
Systematic Review (n=66,130)
Does geographic ancestry provide more clinically relevant predictors of cardiac adaptation than racial categorization in athletes?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.1% vs 0.4%
Geographic ancestry explains more cardiac variation than broad racial categories in athletes, highlighting the need to reform ECG screening criteria and eliminate race-based concepts like the 'Black athlete's heart'.
Challenges race-based cardiac screening in athletes; supports ancestry-specific reference values and further validation studies.
Background/Objectives: Race-based cardiac screening criteria in sports cardiology, including the “Black athlete’s heart” concept, assume biological distinctions that may not reflect physiological reality. This systematic review evaluates whether geographic ancestry provides more clinically relevant predictors of cardiac adaptation than racial categorization. Methods: PubMed was searched (January 2005–July 2025) for studies examining cardiac adaptations in athletes by ethnicity. Data extraction captured demographics, geographic origin, cardiac assessments, and outcomes. Narrative synthesis was employed due to methodological heterogeneity. Results: Forty-seven studies (n = 66,130) revealed substantial within-race heterogeneity. The “Black athlete repolarization variant” prevalence ranged from 1.8% (Brazilian) to 30% (Ghanaian) Black athletes. Left ventricular wall thickness >12 mm (normal <11 mm) occurred in 7.1% of Black versus 0.4% of White athletes, yet varied significantly within Black populations—10.8 ± 1.2 mm in Sub-Saharan versus 9.4 ± 1.1 mm in African-American athletes (p < 0.001). Relative wall thickness ≥0.44 (normal ≤0.42) was presented in 43% of West/Middle African, 23% of East African, and 7% of White athletes. T-wave inversion showed four-fold variation within Black populations (3.6–8.5% West African versus 0.5–2.0% African-American/Caribbean). Current International Criteria demonstrated inequitable specificity: 3.3% false-positive rate in Black versus 1.4% in White athletes. Conclusions: Geographic ancestry explains more cardiac variation than racial categories, supporting contemporary understanding of race as a sociopolitical construct. The persistent diagnostic disparities in ECG screening specificity highlight the need for reform. Transitioning toward protocols incorporating continental origin, anthropometric factors, and social determinants of health—while eliminating terminology like “Black athlete’s heart”—represents an important step toward achieving equity in cardiovascular care for diverse athletic populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corsi et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac adaptations in athletes (n=66,130). Geographic ancestry vs. Racial categorization was evaluated on Left ventricular wall thickness >12 mm. Geographic ancestry revealed substantial within-race heterogeneity in cardiac adaptations, with left ventricular wall thickness >12 mm occurring in 7.1% of Black versus 0.4% of White athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: