Why the study?
Surgery in unrecognised pregnancy carries serious ethical and medicolegal implications, and guidelines in India for preoperative pregnancy testing in surgical patients are lacking.
Does routine preoperative pregnancy testing (POPT) improve detection of unrecognized pregnancy and cost-effectiveness in female surgical patients?
Does routine preoperative pregnancy testing (POPT) improve detection of unrecognized pregnancy and cost-effectiveness in female surgical patients?
While the cost-effectiveness of routine preoperative pregnancy testing is doubtful due to low yield, it should be offered to patients who could possibly be pregnant based on history to mitigate medicolegal risks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No Indian POPT guidelines exist; leaves open whether routine or targeted testing best balances ethical risks.
Surgery in a patient with unrecognised pregnancy has serious ethical and medicolegal implications. There are no guidelines in India for preoperative pregnancy testing (POPT) in surgical patients. This review was undertaken to ascertain utility of routine POPT and whether any specific indication for POPT could be suggested. We performed a literature search to identify publications pertaining to POPT in surgical patients. Searches included PubMed, Google Scholar and internet search for national guidelines. Studies pertaining to incidence of unrecognised pregnancy, cost-effectiveness of POPT, effect of surgery and anaesthesia on pregnancy are included. We excluded articles which were available in languages other than English and those whose full texts were unavailable. Most of the literature about reproductive outcomes after anaesthesia exposure is based on old data. The evidence for teratogenic effect of anaesthetic drugs on human foetus is still inconclusive. Apart from anaesthesia and surgery, the outcome after surgery in unrecognised pregnant patient depends on other factors such as indication for surgery, high incidence of foetal loss in early pregnancy, stress and lifestyle of patient. As it is difficult to unsnarl the effect of these factors, POPT should be offered to all patients who based on history could be possibly pregnant. The cost-effectiveness of POPT appears doubtful, but considering costs associated with miscarriages and medicolegal litigations due to unclear association with anaesthesia, it may indeed be cost-effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerai et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: