Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conditioning to the anxiogenic effects of nicotine has previously been demonstrated in the social interaction test and there was no generalization of conditioning between the social interaction and elevated plus-maze tests. Because the two tests generate distinct states of anxiety, the conditioning could have occurred to the cues associated with the test environment and/or to those associated with the type of anxiety generated by the test. The elevated plus-maze permits separation of these two factors, because quite distinct states of anxiety are generated on trials 1 and 2, whereas the apparatus cues remain the same. Rats that had been tested on day 1 in the plus-maze, 5 min after nicotine (0.45 mg/kg), showed a conditioned anxiogenic response when tested undrugged on day 2. This was shown by significantly lower percentages of open-arm entries and percentage of time spent on the open arms, compared with control groups. Thus, conditioning to apparatus cues is sufficient to mediate a conditioned anxiogenic effect. The importance of the timing of the nicotine-associated cues was demonstrated by the failure to obtain conditioned anxiogenic effects when rats were exposed to the plus-maze on day 1, 30 min after nicotine (0.45 or 0.1 mg/kg).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tucci et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: