Why the study?
Visceral adipose tissue thresholds for increased metabolic syndrome risk vary across populations, regions of interest, and units of measure, leaving it unclear whether a common threshold exists.
Does a common visceral adipose tissue (VAT) threshold exist that indicates heightened metabolic syndrome risk across all populations?
Does a common visceral adipose tissue (VAT) threshold exist that indicates heightened metabolic syndrome risk across all populations?
A systematic review found no single universal visceral adipose tissue threshold for elevated metabolic syndrome risk, highlighting the need for demographic-specific thresholds based on sex, age, and race/ethnicity.
VAT thresholds for MetS risk vary by demographics; supports population-specific cutoffs over universal standards in practice and research.
Summary Beyond obesity, excess levels of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) significantly contribute to the risk of developing metabolic syndrome (MetS), although thresholds for increased risk vary based on population, regions of interest, and units of measure employed. We sought to determine whether a common threshold exists that is indicative of heightened MetS risk across all populations, accounting for sex, age, BMI, and race/ethnicity. A systematic literature review was conducted in September 2023, presenting threshold values for elevated MetS risk. Standardization equations harmonized the results from DXA, CT, and MRI systems to facilitate a comparison of threshold variations across studies. A total of 52 papers were identified. No single threshold could accurately indicate elevated risk for both males and females across varying BMI, race/ethnicity, and age groups. Thresholds fluctuated from 70 to 165.9 cm 2 , with reported values consistently lower in females. Generally, premenopausal females and younger adults manifested elevated risks at lower VAT compared to their older counterparts. Notably, Asian populations exhibited elevated risks at lower VAT areas (70–136 cm 2 ) compared to Caucasian populations (85.6–165.9 cm 2 ). All considered studies reported associations of VAT without accommodating covariates. No single VAT area threshold for elevated MetS risk was discernible post‐harmonization by technology, units of measure, and region of interest. This review summarizes available evidence for MetS risk assessment in clinical practice. Further exploration of demographic‐specific interactions between VAT area and other risk factors is imperative to comprehensively delineate overarching MetS risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennett et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: