Why the study?
Ablation of atypical AVNRT may be unsuccessful after ablation at the right posterior septum, prompting the need for an optimal ablation method to prevent recurrences.
Does radiofrequency ablation 2 mm higher in the septum improve procedural success and prevent recurrence in patients with atypical AVNRT compared to conventional ablation?
Does radiofrequency ablation 2 mm higher in the septum improve procedural success and prevent recurrence in patients with atypical AVNRT compared to conventional ablation?
Performing radiofrequency ablation 2 mm higher in the septum significantly improves procedural success and eliminates long-term recurrence in patients with atypical AVNRT compared to conventional slow pathway ablation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support modified ablation site in atypical AVNRT; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Considering that ablation of atypical AVNRT may be unsuccessful after ablation at the right posterior septum, in this study, we aimed to present an optimal method for ablation of atypical AVNRT. Also, we evaluated the efficacy of this technique for preventing recurrences. METHODS: This is a prospective, double-center study. It was conducted on 62 patients with atypical AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation. The patients were randomly divided into two groups before ablation: 1-Group A (n = 30): treated with conventional ablation at the anatomic area of the slow pathway; 2-Group B (n = 32): ablation was done 2 mm higher in the septum during fluoroscopy. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in groups A and B were 54 ± 11.7 and 55 ± 12.2, respectively (P = 0.43). In group A, ablation was successful in 24 (80%) patients following right-sided slow pathway ablation, and the remaining patients required further treatment with either a left-side approach (N = 4, 13.3%) or ablation of additional regions (N = 2, 6.7%). In group B, ablation was successful in all patients. After a 48-month follow-up, recurrence of symptomatic atypical AVNRT was detected in 4 (13.3%) patients of group A and none of group B patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with atypical AVNRT, ablation 2 mm above the conventional area is more promising regarding success rate and recurrence of the arrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aslani et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: