PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 28, 2025Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical OncologyOpen Access

Validation of mortality risk scores after esophagectomy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Perioperative mortality remains a significant concern after oncological esophagectomy, prompting the need to evaluate and compare existing risk scoring systems.

Do existing mortality risk scores accurately predict postoperative mortality in patients undergoing esophagectomy?

Population

714 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2002 and 2021

Comparison

IESG 90-day mortality risk prediction vs Steyerberg 30-day score vs Fuchs preoperative score

Design

Retrospective cohort study

Authors

SSSabine SchieferNCNerma CrnovrsaninIRIngmar F. Rompen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Limited discrimination of existing scores warrants caution in preoperative risk stratification; leaves open need for improved models in esophageal cancer surgery.

Structured PICO

Do existing mortality risk scores accurately predict postoperative mortality in patients undergoing esophagectomy?

P
Population
714 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2002 and 2021
I
Intervention
Risk stratification using three models: International Esodata Study Group (IESG) 90-day mortality risk prediction, Steyerberg 30-day mortality score, and Fuchs et al. preoperative in-hospital mortality score
O
Outcome
Diagnostic performance of the models assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for mortalityhard clinical

Existing mortality risk scores for esophagectomy have limited predictive ability (AUCs 0.634-0.686) and require improvement for effective clinical application.

Cite This Study

Schiefer et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70e4fd2163a0a01bc5186chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-06074-w
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share