Why the study?
Does digoxin improve left ventricular ejection fraction or affect infarct size in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Does digoxin improve left ventricular ejection fraction or affect infarct size in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Digoxin administration after acute myocardial infarction provides a minimal but significant improvement in ejection fraction without adversely affecting LV perfusion or regional wall motion.
EF improvement with digoxin post-MI was observed without infarct size effect; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before any practice consideration.
The use of digitalis after acute myocardial infarction is controversial. The effect of digoxin on computer-quantitated thallium-201 perfusion scintigrams (Tl-201), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), and percentage of abnormally contracting LV regions (% ACR) was determined in 23 patients. A correlation was established between creatine kinase MB isoenzyme release and initial radionuclide-gated blood pool wall motion estimates of EF (r = -0.73) and % ACR (r = 0.71). After radionuclide assessments, 14 patients received digoxin 18 +/- 23 hours (mean +/- SD) after the rise in CK-MB from baseline, while the remaining nine patients served as controls. In the control group, the mean EF was 0.33 +/- 0.12 on the first study and 0.30 +/- 0.08 on the second study (p = NS). In the digoxin group, the EF after digoxin administration (mean 0.33 +/- 0.11) was significantly different from the initial EF (mean 0.29 +/- 0.09, p less than 0.03); however, digoxin had no apparent effect on infarct size as assessed by sequential % ACR and Tl-201 perfusion data. These data indicate that digoxin resulted in a minimal but significant improvement in EF that did not occur at the expense of LV perfusion or regional wall motion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: