Why the study?
Chemotherapy-induced myocardial dysfunction increases morbidity and mortality, making serial surveillance crucial, but the utility of global longitudinal strain compared to conventional echocardiography needed evaluation in pediatric oncology patients.
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) echocardiography improve the detection of left ventricular dysfunction compared to conventional echocardiography in pediatric oncology patients receiving cardio-toxic chemotherapy?
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) echocardiography improve the detection of left ventricular dysfunction compared to conventional echocardiography in pediatric oncology patients receiving cardio-toxic chemotherapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an effective non-invasive imaging modality for detecting early left ventricular dysfunction in children receiving cardio-toxic chemotherapy.
Background: Chemotherapy-induced myocardial dysfunction (CIMD) is a documented actuate of heightened morbidity and mortality. The gold standard for the surveillance of CIMD is the serial echocardiogram. Two-dimensional speckle echocardiography i.e. global longitudinal strain (GLS) is affirmative diagnostic tool than conventional echocardiography.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of children (age between 6 months to 18 years) who received cardio-toxic chemotherapeutic agents and underwent echocardiography assessment with conventional and GLS imaging at-least 2 times between January 2020 to January 2021 in The Indus Hospital, Karachi at start, 3rd months and 6th months of treatment.Results: We enrolled 122 patients in our study. The mean age was 8.19±4.43. 82 (67.2%) children got the 2 echocardiographic evaluations while 40 (32.8%) children completed three. Of 82 subjects, 17 (22.6%) had a significant reduction in early myocardial deformation indices as measured by two-dimensional (2D) STE using GLS at the end of 3 months of chemotherapy. Before the start of therapy, mean values of ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS) and GLS were 68.6±10.44, 38.8±7.44, and -20.7±4.19 respectively. At 3rd month and 6th month follow up, EF decreased 65.80±9.00 and 62.06±10.62 (p value 0.000) respectively while the values for GLS decreased significantly as -18.4±3.86, -16.68±3.63 (p value 0.02) respectively.Conclusions: GLS is an effective, and non-invasive cardiac imaging modality than a conventional echocardiography in assessment of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in non-symptomatic as well as in symptomatic children with cancers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahzad et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: