This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A series of new organic D−π−A dyes, coded as DS-1, DS-2, DS-3, and DS-4, was designed, synthesized, and characterized by 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, infrared spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. These dyes consist of a di( p -tolyl)phenylamine moiety as an electron donor, a cyanoacetic acid moiety as an electron acceptor/anchoring group, and different types of conducting thiophene units as electron spacers to bridge the donor and acceptor. It was found that both the use of di( p -tolyl)phenylamine donor and the variation of electron spacers in the D−π−A dyes played an essential role in modifying and/or tuning physical properties of organic dyes. These dyes were developed as sensitizers for the application in dye-sensitized TiO 2 nanocrystalline solar cells (DSSCs), and their photophysical and electrochemical properties were investigated. The DSSCs based on the dyes gave good performance in terms of incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) in the range of 400−700 nm. A solar-energy-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) of 7.00% was obtained with the DSSC based on 5-[[2-[ p -(di- p -tolylamino)]styryl]thiophene-yl]thiophene-2-cyanoacrylic acid (DS-2) under simulated AM 1.5 G irradiation (100 mW/cm 2 ): short-circuit current density ( J sc ) of 15.3 mA cm −2; open-circuit voltage ( V oc ) of 0.633 V; fill factor (FF) of 0.725. The density functional theory (DFT) calculation suggests that the electron-transfer distribution moves from the donor unit to the acceptor under light irradiation, which means efficient intramolecular charge transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: