Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation is often underdiagnosed and undertreated by noncardiologists, raising the question of whether artificial intelligence-enabled ECG alerts could improve diagnosis and oral anticoagulant prescribing.
Do artificial intelligence-enabled ECG alerts improve atrial fibrillation diagnosis and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant prescriptions by noncardiologists in emergency or hospitalized patients at risk of stroke?
Do artificial intelligence-enabled ECG alerts improve atrial fibrillation diagnosis and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant prescriptions by noncardiologists in emergency or hospitalized patients at risk of stroke?
AI-ECG alerts significantly improved the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and the prescription of NOACs by noncardiologists in at-risk patients.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often underdiagnosed and undertreated by noncardiologists. This study evaluated whether artificial intelligence-enabled ECG (AI-ECG) alerts could improve AF diagnosis and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant prescriptions by noncardiologists. METHODS: In this open-label, cluster randomized controlled trial (NCT05127460) at 2 hospitals in Taiwan, noncardiologists were randomized to an intervention group (AI-ECG alerts) or control group (usual care). Alerts were sent to physicians when AI-ECG identified AF in emergency or hospitalized patients at risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥1 for men, ≥2 for women), excluding those with prior AF or oral anticoagulant use. Primary end points included a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant prescription within 90 days after discharge, new AF diagnosis, echocardiogram arrangements, and cardiologist visits. Secondary end points were ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 8857 and 8960 patients were treated by 120 and 113 noncardiologists in the intervention and control groups, respectively; 275 and 245 patients had AI-detected AF. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant prescription rate was significantly higher in the intervention group (23.3% versus 12.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.85 [95% CI, 1.11-3.07]). The intervention group also had a higher rate of AF diagnosis (HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.03-1.90]). No significant differences were observed in echocardiogram arrangements, cardiologist visits, or the rates of ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: An AI-ECG alert for AF identification promoted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant prescriptions among noncardiologists, thus reducing the disparity in AF care quality between cardiologists and noncardiologists. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT05127460.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: