Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A linear regression on standard deviations of differential proton magnetometer measurements at distances from a few meters to 50 kilometers indicates a standard deviation of hourly means that varies with site separation as σ=a+bd where a=0.07±0.08nT, b=0.01±0.003nT/km and d is the site separation in kilometers. At a few meters separation, for sites with low cultural noise in both seismically inactive and active regions, the standard deviation of hourly mean data has a mean of 0.12±0.03nT for instruments with 0.25nT sensitivity and 0.07±0.01nT for instruments with 0.125nT sensitivity. The least-count noise contributions are expected to be less than 0.06nT and 0.03nT, while undetermined instrument noise appears to contribute 0.10 and 0.06nT respectively. Instrument temperature sensitivity does not exceed 0.001nT/°C over a range from-6°C to 21°C. For typical site separations of 10 to 15km throughout the San Andreas fault, estimates of σ for hourly mean data range from 0.15 to 0.3nT depending on local magnetization characteristics. Spectral density estimates indicate difference field noise power decreases with increasing frequency at about 3 db/octave. Dominant spectral peaks occur at diurnal harmonics and at the tidal M2 frequency. Geomagnetic difference-field noise limits measurement capability at all frequencies below about 2 c.p.h. Where instrument precision starts to limit detection capability, instruments of higher sensitivity may be useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnston et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: