Research Article| May 01, 1999 Regional granulite facies metamorphism in the Ivrea zone: Is the Mafic Complex the smoking gun or a red herring? Scott A. Barboza; Scott A. Barboza 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351310, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar George W. Bergantz; George W. Bergantz 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351310, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Michael Brown Michael Brown 2Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (1999) 27 (5): 447–450. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0447:RGFMIT>2.3.CO;2 Article history first online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Scott A. Barboza, George W. Bergantz, Michael Brown; Regional granulite facies metamorphism in the Ivrea zone: Is the Mafic Complex the smoking gun or a red herring?. Geology 1999;; 27 (5): 447–450. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0447:RGFMIT>2.3.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract One widely accepted paradigm for the development of continental lower crust is that regional granulite facies metamorphism is caused by intrusion of mafic magma beneath or into the crust (magmatic accretion). The amphibolite to granulite facies supracrustal section exposed in the Ivrea zone (southern Alps, northern Italy) is commonly cited as a classic example establishing this postulated genetic relationship. Our interpretation of the pattern of metamorphic isograds, compositional trends in high-grade metasedimentary rocks, and textural evidence in metapelite, however, indicates that final emplacement of the mafic plutonic rocks (the Mafic Complex) occurred subsequent to the regional thermal maximum. Field and petrographic relations suggest that a spatially restricted contact-melting event in crustal rocks accompanied the emplacement of the Mafic Complex. This inference is consistent with leucosome compositions in migmatites and a low-pressure, high-temperature metamorphic overprint recorded by mineral assemblages in wall rocks proximal to the intrusion. Therefore, evidence of anatexis and metamorphism of crustal rocks associated unequivocally with emplacement of the Mafic Complex is found only within an ∼2-km-wide contact aureole overlying the intrusion. The narrow aureole associated with emplacement of the Mafic Complex demonstrates that, in some cases, emplacement of large volumes of mafic magma within the crust does not inexorably lead to regional-scale granulite facies metamorphism and large ion lithophile element depletion by melt loss. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barboza et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: