Why the study?
Does the dilute Russell viper venom time (DRVVT) accurately detect clinically significant levels of direct oral anticoagulants?
Does the dilute Russell viper venom time (DRVVT) accurately detect clinically significant levels of direct oral anticoagulants?
The DRVVT, in conjunction with the thrombin clotting time (TCT), can serve as an effective screening test for the presence and type of direct oral anticoagulants.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the dilute Russell viper venom time (DRVVT) for the detection of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and to investigate the effect of DOACS on coagulation assays. METHODS: Patients with DOACs and controls had plasma levels determined by an anti-Xa assay and dilute thrombin clotting time (TCT). Levels were correlated with the DRVVT as well as TCT, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen, protein C, protein S and antithrombin levels. The utility of the DRVVT for detecting clinically significant levels of DOACs was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 44 samples from patients taking dabigatran, 83 with rivaroxaban, 18 with apixaban and 55 controls. The PT and APTT failed to detect clinically significant doses of anticoagulants adequately. The TCT was increased in patients taking dabigatran and normal in controls and patients on FXa inhibitors. There was a linear correlation with all DOAC levels and the DRVVT, with moderate precision, but it showed high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (90%) for clinically significant DOAC levels. CONCLUSION: The DRVVT detects clinically significant levels of DOACs and, in conjunction with the TCT, may be used as a screen for the presence and type of DOAC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pratt et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: