Why the study?
dRVVT assays can be affected by DOACs causing false-positive results, but conflicting results indicate significant differences between different reagents and DOACs.
How do different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) affect the results of various dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) assays in normal plasma?
How do different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) affect the results of various dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) assays in normal plasma?
DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban, exhibit highly variable, reagent-dependent interference on dRVVT assays, highlighting the risk of false-positive lupus anticoagulant testing and the need for reagent-specific awareness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DOAC interference may risk false-positive dRVVT lupus anticoagulant results; animal data leaves open human validation and reagent standardization.
INTRODUCTION: Dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) assays can be affected by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which may cause false-positive results. However, there are conflicting results indicating significant differences between different reagents and DOACs. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of DOACs on dRVVT assays. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Samples were prepared by adding DOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) to pooled normal plasma in the concentration range 0 to 800 µg/L. Six integrated dRVVT reagents were used, all composed of a screen assay (low phospholipid content) and a confirm assay (high phospholipid content). The screen/confirm dRVVT results were expressed as normalized ratios. To further evaluate the observed differences between tests and DOACs, addition of synthetic phospholipids was used. RESULTS: The dRVVT ratios increased dose dependently for all DOACs, with four of the six tests and the DOAC rivaroxaban having the greatest effect. With one test, the ratios were almost unaffected with increasing DOAC concentration, whereas another test revealed a negative dose dependency for all DOACs. Variable DOAC effects can be explained by different effects on dRVVT screen and confirm clotting time. Adding synthetic phospholipids to samples containing rivaroxaban resulted in greatly reduced screen clotting times and thereby lower calculated dRVVT ratios. CONCLUSIONS: There is a great variability in the dRVVT test result with different DOACs. The dRVVT ratios are unaffected for some reagents and this can be explained by an equal dose-dependent effect on both screen and confirm assays. The phospholipid type and content of the different reagents may contribute to the observed differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hillarp et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: