Key result
Surgical LAA occlusion fails to alter circulating biomarker levels at 30 days or 1 year.
Why the study?
The mechanisms underlying the clinical benefit of surgical left atrial appendage occlusion in reducing ischemic stroke or systemic embolism remain unclear, prompting investigation of changes in circulating biomarkers.
Does surgical left atrial appendage occlusion change levels of circulating biomarkers in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery?
RCT (n=208)
randomized
No
Does surgical left atrial appendage occlusion change levels of circulating biomarkers in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery?
Surgical LAAO does not lead to consistent changes in circulating biomarkers over 1 year, indicating its clinical stroke-reduction benefit is likely not driven by systemic changes in coagulation, inflammation, or hemodynamic stress.
Biomarker stability should not alter LAAO recommendations in AF cardiac surgery; leaves open non-biomarker mechanisms for LAAOS III stroke reduction.
BACKGROUND: The Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS) III showed that surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) reduced ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether LAAO changes levels of circulating biomarkers of coagulation activation, inflammation, hemodynamic stress or myocardial injury after surgical LAAO. METHODS: In this single-center biomarker substudy of LAAOS III, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein were measured at baseline and at 30 days and/or 1 year in patients randomized to LAAO or no LAAO. Biomarker levels and changes from baseline were compared by treatment group. Exploratory landmark Cox models assessed associations between biomarker changes and subsequent stroke/SE after the 30-day and 1-year landmarks. RESULTS: Baseline samples were available for 208 participants, 30-day samples for 170, and 1-year samples for 123. Baseline biomarker levels were similar between groups. At 30 days, all measured biomarkers increased without between-group differences. At 1 year, most biomarkers had returned toward baseline. Too few events occurred after the 30-day and 1-year landmarks to support reliable analyses on biomarker changes and subsequent stroke/SE. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical LAAO was not associated with consistent changes in circulating biomarkers over 1 year in this exploratory substudy, despite its clinical benefit. The lack of a detectable effect on the circulating biomarkers evaluated in this study does not provide a mechanistic explanation for the clinical benefit of surgical LAAO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauw et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (n=208). Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) vs. No LAAO was evaluated on Changes in levels of circulating biomarkers (D-dimer, CRP, IL-6, NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, H-FABP) at 30 days and 1 year. In 208 patients, surgical left atrial appendage occlusion was not associated with between-group differences in circulating biomarker levels at 30 days or 1 year compared to no occlusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: