Why the study?
Does the APACHE II score predict postoperative morbidity and mortality better than the ASA classification system in patients undergoing major general surgical operations?
Does the APACHE II score predict postoperative morbidity and mortality better than the ASA classification system in patients undergoing major general surgical operations?
The APACHE II score is superior to the ASA classification system for predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing major general surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of the APACHE II score and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system in preoperative evaluation of patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Italy. SUBJECTS: 187 consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency major general surgical operations. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were evaluated preoperatively using both indices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality within 30 days. RESULTS: Logistic regression and ROC curve analyses showed that the APACHE II score predicted morbidity and mortality well; it was superior to the ASA system in predicting outcome (area under the curve 0.894 for the APACHE II index, 0.777 for the ASA system; p < 0.001). The APACHE II score without its age points (area 0.888) had the same prognostic value as the complete score (area 0.894; p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The APACHE II score may help clinicians to evaluate preoperatively the risk of postoperative morbidity and death after major general surgical operations. Age does not seem to have a specific weight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vittorio Saba Luigi Goffi (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: