Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With the accessibility of customers’ purchase history and the development of data analytics, firms that have a better understanding of customer behaviours might charge different prices to their repeat and new customers. This mechanism is referred to as behaviour-based pricing (BBP). We model the competition of two vertically differentiated supply chains to study the strategic interaction between upstream contract choices (long-term or short-term) and downstream pricing mechanisms (BBP or not). We show that manufacturers always prefer long-term wholesale contracts. The adoption of BBP will decrease the profits of both manufacturers and the reseller that sells a low-quality product. However, the reseller that sells a high-quality product can benefit from BBP under certain conditions. Interestingly, when the resellers have the power to determine the type of wholesale contracts, a hybrid configuration where one supply chain uses a long-term contract and the other uses a short-term contract, could occur in equilibrium. Moreover, we find that the customers have a higher surplus under BBP, whereas the short-term wholesale contract can further increase the surplus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: