Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article offers an investigation of the social settings within which socialisation of modern science in the later imperial China was initialised by the newly emerged social players, namely the scientific gentry, during the period of "Self-strengthening" Movement (1860-1895). Sociological perspectives are deployed in historical examination of the roles played by scientific knowledge in structuring social life in China, with particular attention being paid to how the traditional gentry adopting modern science and technology in preserving its status as the ruling class, which gave rise to the scientific gentry while the country entered the modern era. Scientific knowledge production and curation are thus perceived in the broader cultural and institutional background of China's confrontation with modernity. Beyond delineating modern science and technology adopted by the gentry as self-strengthening device, I argue that more fundamental impacts were brought forth to China's social structure as scientific knowledge became socialised. The findings shed new lights to our understanding of relationship between socialisation of modern science and modernisation of China's society, both shall serve as prominent objectives in studies of science and society in China as composing part of world history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kai Wang (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: