Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This conceptual paper aims to develop a more analytically useful model for understanding teacher reflection in physical education. Through critical examination on conventional conceptualizations of teacher reflection, the authors identify recurring gaps of ambiguity and analytical limitation: conceptual overload or abstract, one-dimensional trap, and personal dimension being overlooked. Upon this analysis, we propose four analytical criteria: cognitive depth, critical stance, agency, and foci. We then demonstrate how these criteria can be reassembled into a multidimensional model and illustrate how the model can be applied to analyze teacher reflection in practice. We argue this multidimensional model offers a structured lens for examining teacher reflections and provides a conceptual foundation for future research and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: