Why the study?
Physical activity coaching interventions improve physical activity in COPD in the short term, but long-term effects are lacking.
Does a full physical activity coaching intervention improve physical activity in patients with COPD compared to a light coaching intervention?
Does a full physical activity coaching intervention improve physical activity in patients with COPD compared to a light coaching intervention?
A comprehensive 12-month physical activity coaching program did not improve physical activity levels in COPD patients compared to a light coaching intervention.
Full coaching adds no long-term PA benefit over light coaching in COPD; challenges intensity assumptions and leaves optimal maintenance strategies open.
Rationale Physical activity (PA) is decreased in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). PA coaching interventions are effective to improve PA in the short term, yet long-term effects are lacking. Providing an individualized step goal, feedback, and regular contact with a coach might be important aspects to obtain a long-term effect. Objectives To investigate the effectiveness of a 12-month fully deployed PA coaching intervention to improve and maintain PA in patients with COPD, compared with a light coaching intervention. Methods In this multicenter, single-blind randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to either a full coaching intervention (including an activity tracker and a smartphone application with dynamic goal setting, regular feedback, and contact with a coach) or a light PA coaching group (including an activity tracker, a fixed step goal, and limited feedback or contact with a coach). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Measurements and Main Results One hundred fifty participants with COPD were randomized to the full (n = 77) and light (n = 73) coaching groups. No between-group differences were observed for objectively measured PA and perceived amount of PA measured with the Clinical Visit–PROactive Physical Activity instrument at 6-month follow-up (172 ± 367 steps/d [P = 0.64] and 2.5 ± 2.2 points [P = 0.26], respectively) and at 12-month follow-up (−43 ± 372 steps/d [P = 0.91] and 2.1 ± 2.2 points [P = 0.34], respectively). Responder rates were similar for the full and light coaching groups at 12 months (19% and 22%, respectively). Conclusions A full coaching intervention providing dynamic individualized step goals, adequate feedback, and regular contact with a coach did not have additional effects on PA at 12 months compared with a light coaching intervention. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 04139200).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blondeel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: