Why the study?
Demand for contactless vital sign monitoring has increased, but the impact of various Doppler radar design choices on measuring cardiac activity remains to be understood.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FMCW architecture and signal processing algorithms are the primary drivers of performance in radar-based cardiac activity measurement, allowing future systems to utilize cheaper, lower-frequency components without performance loss.
In recent years, with the increased interest in smart home technology and the increased need to remotely monitor patients due to the pandemic, demand for contactless systems for vital sign measurements has also been on the rise. One of these kinds of systems are Doppler radar systems. Their design is composed of several choices that could possibly have a significant impact on their overall performance, more specifically those focused on the measurement of cardiac activity. This review, conducted using works obtained from relevant scientific databases, aims to understand the impact of these design choices on the performance of systems measuring either heart rate (HR) or heart rate variability (HRV). To that end, an analysis of the performance based on hardware architecture, carrier frequency, and measurement distance was conducted for works focusing on both of the aforementioned cardiac parameters, and signal processing trends were discussed. What was found was that the system architecture and signal processing algorithms had the most impact on the performance, with FMCW being the best performing architecture, whereas factors like carrier frequency did not have an impact.This means that newer systems can focus on cheaper, lower-frequency systems without any performance degradation, which will make research easier.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frazão et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: