Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 1995Clinical Cardiology

Abnormal pericardial thickening (> 3 mm) on CT or MRI confirms the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis when the characteristic hemodynamic pattern is present.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

How can constrictive pericarditis be accurately diagnosed and differentiated from restrictive cardiomyopathy using modern diagnostic modalities?

Population

Patients with suspected constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy

Design

Review

Authors

NFNoble O. Fowler

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports CT/MRI confirmation of constrictive pericarditis with hemodynamics; leaves open standardized multimodality protocols for differentiation from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Structured PICO

How can constrictive pericarditis be accurately diagnosed and differentiated from restrictive cardiomyopathy using modern diagnostic modalities?

P
Population
Patients with suspected constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy
I
Intervention
Diagnostic modalities including echocardiography, Doppler studies, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hemodynamics, and endomyocardial biopsy
O
Outcome
Differentiation between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy

This review highlights the importance of multimodality imaging, including Doppler echocardiography, CT, and MRI, in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Cite This Study

Noble O. Fowler (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70f28bfe4101aa97e06238https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960180610
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share