Four non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, 9-CI-TIBO [(+)-S-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-9- chloro-5-methyl-6-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)imidazo(4,5,1-jk)(1,4)- benzodiazepin-2(1H)-thione)], nevirapine (6,11-dihydro-11-cyclopropyl-4-methyl-dipyrido[2,3-b:2',3'-e]-[1,4]di azepin- 6-one), MSA-300 (N-[cis-2-(2-hydroxy-3-acetyl-6-methoxy-phenyl)-cyclopropyl]-N'- (5-chloropyrid-2-yl)-thiourea) and delavirdine ¿1-(5-methanesulphonamido-1H-indol-2-yl-carbonyl)-4-[3- (1-methylethylamino)pyridinyl]piperazine¿ were analysed for the mode of action of their inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RT in three different assays utilizing a 96-well microtitre plate format, with solid-phase conjugated poly(rA) as template. These were: (i) direct RT assay, for determination of IC50 values of RT inhibitors; (ii) RT template/primer binding inhibition (BIC) assay, for measuring the effect of various substances on the RT activity binding to template/primer; (iii) RT protein ELISA, for measuring RT protein binding to template/primer with a monoclonal antibody reactive against a peptide in the RNase H region. MSA-300 and delavirdine gave the lowest IC50 values, ranging from 0.17 microM to 0.24 microM for MSA-300 and from 0.12 microM to 0.38 microM for delavirdine, whereas higher IC50 values of approximately 20 microM were obtained for 9-CI-TIBO at all primer concentrations. None of the non-nucleoside substances had inhibiting effects on the binding of template, primer, or template/primer to RT protein. Their inhibition of RT activity was not due to prevention of RT binding to template/primer. TIBO, nevirapine and delavirdine bound to RT reversibly, and they bound more tightly to RT template/primer ternary than to RT template binary complex. MSA-300 showed a comparatively high affinity for the enzyme. The utility of the three assays in relation to screening and analysis of RT inhibitory substances is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: