Why the study?
Does metoprolol compared to diltiazem improve antianginal efficacy in patients with stable angina stratified by the presence of a silent ischemic interval?
Does metoprolol compared to diltiazem improve antianginal efficacy in patients with stable angina stratified by the presence of a silent ischemic interval?
The presence of a silent ischemic interval on exercise testing predicts a better response to metoprolol compared to diltiazem in patients with stable angina.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SII-positive stable angina patients respond better to metoprolol than diltiazem; supports SII-guided beta-blocker selection in practice and trials.
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: There is no method available to predict the relative antianginal efficacy of beta blockers and calcium-channel antagonists. The present study was undertaken to assess the role of silent ischemic interval (SII) on exercise treadmill test (ETT) as a predictor of response to therapy with metoprolol and diltiazem in patients with stable angina. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with stable angina were divided into two groups depending upon the presence or absence of an SII gap of at least 1 min between onset of ST depression and appearance of angina on ETT. Metoprolol (50-100 mg twice daily) and diltiazem (60-120 mg three times daily) were randomly assigned for 6 weeks to patients in each group, and then patients were crossed over for further 6 weeks after a washout period of 2 weeks. Antianginal efficacy was assessed by clinical and exercise parameters. RESULTS: In patients with SII, the clinical responder rate was better with metoprolol than with diltiazem (90 vs. 60%, respectively), and on ETT, metoprolol produced significant improvement in the total exercise time (p< 0.01), time to 1 mm ST depression (p <0.01), time to angina (p <0.01), and a significant decrease in peak rate-pressure product (p<0.001), whereas diltiazem had no significant effect on exercise parameters. However, in patients without SII, metoprolol and diltiazem had a similar clinical responder rate (57%), and both produced a significant increase in total exercise time (p < 0.01), time to 1 mm ST depression (p < 0.01), and time to angina (p < 0.01). In addition, metoprolol had a significant effect on peak rate-pressure product (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Silent ischemic interval on ETT can be a predictor of response to antianginal therapy in stable angina, as patients with SII respond better to metoprolol and those without SII respond equally to both metoprolol and diltiazem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dwivedi et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: