Key result
Prolonged venous transit is linked to ~4-fold higher odds of poor stroke recovery.
Why the study?
Is prolonged venous transit associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with large core acute ischemic stroke?
Cohort (n=100)
Is prolonged venous transit associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with large core acute ischemic stroke?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prolonged venous transit on pretreatment CT perfusion is an independent predictor of unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with large core acute ischemic stroke.
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Large core acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) is associated with high rates of disability despite mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Prolonged venous transit (PVT), a marker of impaired venous drainage on CT perfusion, has emerged as a potential prognostic indicator, but its role in large core AIS-LVO remains unclear. We aimed to test the hypothesis that PVT is independently associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with large core AIS-LVO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from consecutive patients with AIS-LVO and large ischemic core volumes (ASPECTS <6 or relative cerebral blood flow < 30% volume ≥50 mL; per SELECT-2 trial definition) between September 1, 2016 and September 2, 2024. PVT was assessed on pretreatment CT perfusion based on qualitative time-to-maximum (Tmax) maps and defined as Tmax ≥10 seconds in the superior sagittal sinus or torcula. The primary outcome was unfavorable functional recovery at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 4-6. RESULTS: 100 patients met inclusion criteria, and 41 (41%) had PVT. Unfavorable functional outcomes were more frequent in the PVT+ group (59% vs. 37%, p=0.036). Multivariable analysis confirmed that PVT was independently associated with unfavorable outcomes (adjusted OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.15-14.4, p=0.03), even after accounting for penumbra size (Tmax >6s) and large core volumes (rCBF <30%). Other predictors included older age (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11, P=0.003), higher admission NIHSS (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.29, P=0.005), and larger rCBF <30% volume (adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04, P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: PVT is independently associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with large core AIS-LVO. These findings suggest PVT may serve as a prognostic marker, warranting further investigation and validation in larger prospective studies to guide treatment decisions in this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salim et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Large core acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) (n=100). Prolonged venous transit (PVT) vs. No prolonged venous transit was evaluated on Unfavorable functional recovery at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 4-6 (adjusted OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.15-14.4, p=0.03). Prolonged venous transit was independently associated with unfavorable functional recovery at 90 days in patients with large core acute ischemic stroke (adjusted OR 4.07; 95% CI 1.15-14.4; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: