Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaction reversals to within 0.2 kbar locate the quartz ⇆ coesite equilibrium at 24.6, 24.9, 25.5, 26.2, 27.0, 27.9, 28.8, and 29.7 kbar at 350, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, and 1000°C, respectively, using well‐calibrated (frictionless), 2.54‐cm diameter NaCl furnace assemblies in piston‐cylinder apparatus. The equilibrium is unaffected by the presence of H 2 O or jadeite, contrary to previous proposals. The positive dP/dT of the reaction at T < 500°C is inconsistent with existing thermochemical data for coesite. Numerous tight reversals provide a sound basis for use of the quartz ⇆ coesite equilibrium as a calibration of pressure in high‐pressure apparatus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohlen et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: