Why the study?
Optimal heart function relies on synchronization between electrical and mechanical activity, but electromechanical activity using synchronized PCG and ECG devices had not been characterized in cats with cardiomyopathy.
Does phonocardiography synchronized with ECG detect differences in electromechanical activity between healthy cats and cats with cardiomyopathy?
Does phonocardiography synchronized with ECG detect differences in electromechanical activity between healthy cats and cats with cardiomyopathy?
A pilot PCG device synchronized with ECG identified prolonged electromechanical activation and mechanical systole relative to heart rate in cats with cardiomyopathy.
Optimal heart function depends on perfect synchronization between electrical and mechanical activity. In this pilot study, we aimed to investigate the electromechanical activity of the heart in healthy cats and cats with cardiomyopathy with phonocardiography (PCG) synchronized to an electrocardiography (ECG) pilot device. We included 29 cats (12 healthy cats and 17 cats diagnosed with cardiomyopathy) and performed a clinical examination, PCG synchronized with ECG and echocardiography. We measured the following durations with the pilot PCG device synchronized with ECG: QRS (ventricular depolarization), QT interval (electrical systole), QS1 interval (electromechanical activation time (EMAT)), S1S2 (mechanical systole), QS2 interval (electrical and mechanical systole) and electromechanical window (end of T wave to the beginning of S2). The measured parameters did not differ between healthy cats and cats with cardiomyopathy; however, in cats with cardiomyopathy, EMAT/RR, QS2/RR and S1S2/RR were significantly longer than in healthy cats. This suggests that the hypertrophied myocardium takes longer to generate sufficient pressure to close the mitral valve and that electrical systole, i.e., depolarization and repolarization, and mechanical systoles are longer in cats with cardiomyopathy. The PCG synchronized with the ECG pilot device proved to be a valuable tool for evaluating the electromechanical activity of the feline heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brložnik et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: