Why the study?
Does a miniature wireless motion sensor accurately measure heartbeat and respiration rate compared to commercial reference sensors?
Does a miniature wireless motion sensor accurately measure heartbeat and respiration rate compared to commercial reference sensors?
A novel miniature wireless sensor provides accurate cardiorespiratory monitoring comparable to commercial gold standards, suggesting utility for in-home health tracking.
The progress of microelectromechanical systems tends to fabricate miniature motion sensors that can be used for various purposes of biomedical systems, particularly on-body applications. A miniature wireless sensor is developed that not only monitors heartbeat and respiration rate based on chest movements but also identifies initial problems in the cardiorespiratory system, presenting a healthy measure defined based on height and length of the normal distribution of respiration rate and heartbeat. The obtained results of various tests are compared with two commercial sensors consisting of electrocardiogram sensor as well as belt sensor of respiration rate as a reference (gold standard), showing that the root-mean-square errors obtain <2.27 beats/min for a heartbeat and 0.93 breaths/min for respiration rate. In addition, the standard deviation of the errors reaches <1.26 and 0.63 for heartbeat and respiration rates, separately. According to the outcome results, the sensor can be considered an appropriate candidate for in-home health monitoring, particularly early detection of cardiovascular system problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbasi‐Kesbi et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: