Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electronic structure of Cu, Ag, and Au impurities in silicon is studied self-consistently using the quasiband crystal-field Green's-function method. We find that a substitutional model results in a two-level (acceptor and donor), three-charge-state (A⁺, A⁰, and A^-) system, which suggests that these defects are amphoteric. Our results show that these substitutional impurities form e-type and t₂-type crystal-field resonances (CFR) near the center of the valence band and a dangling-bond hybrid (DBH) t₂ level in the gap. The eCFR and t₂CFR states are fully occupied and represent the perturbed and hybridized impurity atomic orbitals (not simply a ``d¹⁰'' configuration). They are magnetically and electrically inactive but are predicted to be optically active in the uv, producing both impurity-bound core excitons as well as localized-to-itinerantd{→}s transitions with their attendant multiplet structure. The t₂DBH gap level comprises antibonding hybrids of the central impurity orbitals with the vacancy dangling bonds. Its delocalization suggests that both the exchange splitting and the many-electron multiplet separations are small, as opposed to the situation encountered in main-group 3d impurities (e.g., Cr, Mn, Fe) in silicon. Consequently, for group-IB impurities, Jahn-Teller distortions should not be suppressed; the magnetic and electrical response of the system is then determined by these split-off components of the t₂DBH orbital. Thecalculated donor and acceptor transition energies suggest a 0.15--0.25 eV lattice relaxation energy and that a spin S=(1/2) resonance may be observed for Si:Au⁰ if the Fermi energy is located above the donor but below the acceptor energy. Study of the bonding in these systems suggests a depopulation of the atomic s and d orbitals and participation of the metal p orbitals in bond formation. The results of this study conflict both with the Ludwig-Woodbury ionic model and with the s electron (i.e., corelike d orbital) model. Calculations for interstitial gold in Si reveal a hyperdeep s-like a₁ state just below the valence-band minimum, few d-like resonances in the lower part of the valence band, anda virtually bound and delocalized a₁ state just near the conduction-band minimum. This state can lead to a simple shallow-donor behavior. Our model for the substitutional and interstitial group-IB impurities is used to discuss site-exchange reactions and to analyze various models employed previously to describe the electronic level schemes for these centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazzio et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: