Why the study?
It was investigated whether FEF 25-75%, peak minute ventilation, and breathing patterns differ between highly trained endurance athletes with and without expiratory flow limitation during exercise.
Do FEF25-75%, peak minute ventilation, and breathing patterns differ between highly trained endurance athletes with and without expiratory flow limitation during maximal exercise?
Do FEF25-75%, peak minute ventilation, and breathing patterns differ between highly trained endurance athletes with and without expiratory flow limitation during maximal exercise?
In highly trained endurance athletes, expiratory flow limitation during maximal exercise is primarily driven by reduced expiratory flow capacity rather than increased ventilatory demand.
Lower FEF25-75% may predispose athletes to EFL; leaves open causal mechanisms and training effects.
Background Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during exercise in highly trained individuals is thought to result from increased ventilatory demands that exceed the capacity of the respiratory system, which does not fully adapt to exercise training. Reduced forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF 25-75% ), a marker of small airway function, may contribute to EFL by limiting the maximum expiratory flows available during the hyperpnea of exercise. This study investigated whether FEF 25-75% , peak minute ventilation (V̇ E ), and breathing patterns differ between highly trained endurance athletes with and without EFL. Methods Forty highly trained endurance athletes (20 males and 20 females; V̇O 2 max: 59.6±9.2 mL∙kg -1 ∙min -1 ) completed spirometry and a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary treadmill exercise test. EFL was assessed by superimposing tidal flow-volume loops within the maximum flow-volume loop according to end-expiratory lung volume. Results During maximal exercise, 40% of participants ( n = 16: 7 males, 9 females) developed EFL, with no significant sex differences ( P >0.05). Athletes with EFL had significantly lower FEF 25-75% (3.45±0.78 vs. 4.16±0.98 L∙s -1 , P= 0.020, d = 0.802) and a higher ventilatory demand-to-capacity ratio (V̇ E /V̇ Ecap ) (0.86±0.14 vs. 0.66±0.11, P <0.01, d = 1.589) compared to those without EFL. There were no significant differences in absolute tidal volume, breathing frequency or V̇ E between groups ( P >0.05). Conclusion In a homogeneous cohort of highly trained endurance athletes, EFL during maximal treadmill exercise appears to be primarily driven by a reduced capacity to generate expiratory flow, as evidenced by lower FEF 25-75%, rather than differences in ventilatory demand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hind et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: