Why the study?
Individuals with heritable thoracic aortic disease face high risks of deadly aortic dissections, but genetic testing identifies causative variants in only a minority of cases.
Does the use of advanced splice prediction tools identify non-canonical splice variants as a contributor to thoracic aortic disease in patients with negative standard genetic testing?
Does the use of advanced splice prediction tools identify non-canonical splice variants as a contributor to thoracic aortic disease in patients with negative standard genetic testing?
Non-canonical splice variants are an underrecognized genetic contributor to thoracic aortic disease, suggesting advanced splice prediction tools could improve diagnostic yield in unsolved cases.
NCVAS may explain unsolved HTAD cases; leaves open routine inclusion in genetic testing pending validation.
Individuals with heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD) face a high risk of deadly aortic dissections, but genetic testing identifies causative variants in only a minority of cases. We explored the contribution of non-canonical splice variants (NCVAS) to thoracic aortic disease (TAD) using SpliceAI and sequencing data from diverse cohorts, including 551 early-onset sporadic dissection cases and 437 HTAD probands with exome sequencing, 57 HTAD pedigrees with whole genome sequencing, and select sporadic cases with clinical panel testing. NCVAS were identified in syndromic HTAD genes such as FBN1, SMAD3, and COL3A1, including intronic variants in FBN1 in two Marfan syndrome (MFS) families. Validation in the Penn Medicine BioBank and UK Biobank showed enrichment of NCVAS in HTAD-associated genes among dissections. These findings suggest NCVAS are an underrecognized contributor to TAD, particularly in sporadic dissection and unsolved MFS cases, highlighting the potential of advanced splice prediction tools in genetic diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murdock et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: