Why the study?
It remains unclear which exercise mode optimally protects executive function in young adults and what cerebral blood flow mechanisms underlie exercise-induced cognitive benefits.
Does high-intensity interval training or moderate-intensity continuous training improve executive function and cerebral blood flow in healthy young adults?
Does high-intensity interval training or moderate-intensity continuous training improve executive function and cerebral blood flow in healthy young adults?
A 12-week moderate-intensity continuous training intervention improved cerebral blood flow and executive function better than high-intensity interval training among healthy young adults.
MICT outperforms HIIT for executive function via improved CBF in young adults; extends RCT evidence favoring moderate continuous training for cognitive health.
Objective: Studies have demonstrated that exercise benefits executive function. However, it is still unclear which exercise mode is optimal for protecting executive function among young adults and the evidence of the cerebral blood flow (CBF) mechanism of exercise on cognition. Thus, this study aimed to compare the intervention effect and the CBF mechanism of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on executive function. Study design : This was a double-blinded randomised controlled trial study conducted from October 2020 to January 2021 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04830059). Ninety-three healthy young adults were randomized into the HIIT (N=33), MICT (N=32), and control groups (N=28). Participants in exercise groups were guided to perform 40 minutes of HIIT and MICT three times a week for 12 weeks, and the control group received health education for the same period. Executive function was measured by trail-making test (TMT), and CBF was measured by transcranial Doppler flow analyzer (EMS-9WA) before and after interventions. Results: The time of the TMT task among the MICT group improved significantly compared with the control group (β = -10.175, 95% CI = -20.320, -0.031). The PI (β = 0.120, 95% CI = 0.018, 0.222), RI (β = 0.043, 95% CI = 0.005, 0.082), and S/D (β = 0.277, 95% CI = 0.048, 0.507) of the CBF among MICT group improved significantly compared with the control group. The time of TMT was associated with the Vs (F = 5.414, P = 0.022), PI (F = 4.973, P = 0.012), and RI (F = 5.845, P = 0.006). Moreover, the accuracy of TMT was associated with PI (F = 4.797, P = 0.036), RI (F = 5.394, P = 0.024), and S/D (F = 4.312, P = 0.05). Conclusion: A 12-week MICT intervention improved CBF and executive function better than HIIT among young adults. Furthermore, CBF was one of the potential mechanisms that exercise improved the cognitive function of young people, which provided practical evidence for encouraging people to exercise regularly to maintain executive function and enhance brain health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: