Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in predicting malignancy risk in thyroid nodules and to compare the TI-RADS findings with the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) Bethesda System in a tertiary center. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1421 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided FNA between January 2021 and September 2023. Thyroid nodules were classified according to TI-RADS criteria and compared with cytological findings based on the Bethesda System. Sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TI-RADS in forecasting thyroid malignancy. Results: The mean age of the studied population was 48.2 ± 14.2 years, with 82.1% females and 17.9% males. Malignant nodules were associated with significantly higher TI-RADS scores ( P < 0.001). TI-RADS 5 (highly suspicious) demonstrated the highest malignancy risk with an OR of 4.28 (95% confidence interval: 2.76–6.64) and an accuracy of 83.0% ( P < 0.001). Male gender, solitary nodules, taller-than-wide shape, very hypoechoic texture, and punctate echogenic foci were all significantly correlated with malignancy ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: TI-RADS, particularly when combined with FNA Bethesda System findings, provides a reliable tool for stratifying thyroid nodule malignancy risk. Its use in clinical decision-making can enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve the patient outcomes by minimizing unnecessary invasive procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alturkistani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: