Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite the increasing recognition of health as a fundamental dimension in urban design and planning, it remains insufficiently incorporated into urban planning practice and policymaking. This study reexamines the ‘Knowledge Translation’ (KT) process through a literature review (N = 53) to address the gap between the public health and urban planning arenas. By analyzing the key KT components – knowledge, guidance, and implementation – we identified additional factors influencing the process and highlighted gaps and opportunities for improvement. Building on these insights, we developed a visual conceptual framework that synthesizes existing knowledge and addresses critical gaps to support urban practitioners and policymakers in creating ‘healthy cities’. The framework conceptualizes KT as a dynamic, iterative process guided by three key drivers: (i) continuous interaction among knowledge, guidance and implementation, all tailored to local contexts and shaped by decision-making processes; (ii) interdisciplinary and cross-sector collaboration, including active engagement with local communities to create a shared vision of a healthy city; and (iii) a ‘control center’, that integrates these components, facilitates training, and ensures ongoing evaluation and calibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Callejas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: