Why the study?
Do class III antiarrhythmic agents (sotalol, amiodarone, dofetilide) maintain normal sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
Do class III antiarrhythmic agents (sotalol, amiodarone, dofetilide) maintain normal sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
Amiodarone is the most efficacious class III antiarrhythmic for maintaining sinus rhythm in chronic AF, but selection must be individualized due to varying safety profiles like torsades de pointes and noncardiac toxicities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform individualized class III selection in chronic AF; leaves open head-to-head safety trials.
A noteworthy shift from class I to class III antiarrhythmic agents for suppression of atrial fibrillation has occurred. Sotalol, amiodarone, and dofetilide have been evaluated for their ability to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. All of these agents are moderately effective; however, amiodarone appears to be most efficacious. Aside from their common class III actions, these agents have profoundly different pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, safety, and drug interaction profiles that help guide drug selection. Amiodarone and dofetilide are safe in patients who have had a myocardial infarction and those with heart failure. The safety of commercially available d,l-sotalol in these patients is poorly understood. Torsades de pointes is the most serious adverse effect of sotalol and dofetilide, and risk increases with renal dysfunction. Amiodarone has minimal proarrhythmic risk but has numerous noncardiac toxicities that require frequent monitoring. Overall, an ideal antiarrhythmic agent does not exist, and drug selection should be highly individualized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsikouris et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: