Key result
VF inducibility on amiodarone is linked to ~40% 5-year survival versus 94% with monomorphic VT.
Why the study?
The value of programmed electrical stimulation of the heart in predicting sudden death in patients receiving amiodarone for ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial infarction needed to be examined.
Does the induction of ventricular fibrillation during programmed electrical stimulation predict sudden death in post-myocardial infarction patients treated with amiodarone for ventricular tachyarrhythmias?
Cohort (n=106)
No
Does the induction of ventricular fibrillation during programmed electrical stimulation predict sudden death in post-myocardial infarction patients treated with amiodarone for ventricular tachyarrhythmias?
In post-myocardial infarction patients receiving amiodarone for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, the induction of ventricular fibrillation during programmed electrical stimulation indicates a high risk of sudden death.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
VF inducibility on amiodarone plus LVEF <40% may flag high sudden-death risk post-MI; leaves open whether PES-guided therapy improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVE--To examine the value of programmed electrical stimulation of the heart in predicting sudden death in patients receiving amiodarone to treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial infarction. DESIGN--Consecutive patients; retrospective study. SETTING--Referral centre for cardiology, academic hospital. PATIENTS--106 patients with ventricular tachycardia (n = 77) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 29) late after myocardial infarction. INTERVENTIONS--Programmed electrical stimulation was performed while on amiodarone treatment for at least one month. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--In 80/106 patients either ventricular fibrillation (n = 15) or sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 65) was induced. After a mean follow up of 50 (SD 40) months (1-144), 11 patients died suddenly and two used their implantable cardioverter debfibrillator. By multivariate analysis two predictors for sudden death were found: (1) inducibility of ventricular fibrillation under amiodarone treatment (P << 0.001), and (2) a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 40% (P < 0.05). The survival rate at one, two, three, and five years was 70%, 62%, 62%, and 40% respectively for patients in whom ventricular fibrillation was induced, and 98%, 96%, 94%, 94% for patients with induced sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Where there was no sustained arrhythmia, five year survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS--In patients receiving amiodarone because of life threatening ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction, inducibility of ventricular fibrillation, but not of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, indicates a high risk of sudden death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez et al. (1996) conducted a cohort in Ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial infarction (n=106). Inducibility of ventricular fibrillation during programmed electrical stimulation on amiodarone vs. Inducibility of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia or no sustained arrhythmia was evaluated on 5-year survival rate (freedom from sudden death) (p=<<0.001). Inducibility of ventricular fibrillation on amiodarone predicted sudden death (P<<0.001), with 5-year survival of 40% vs 94% for induced monomorphic VT and 100% for non-inducible patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: