Why the study?
Does azilsartan medoxomil reduce blood pressure more effectively than alternative ARBs or ACE inhibitors in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes?
Does azilsartan medoxomil reduce blood pressure more effectively than alternative ARBs or ACE inhibitors in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes?
Azilsartan medoxomil effectively reduces blood pressure in hypertensive diabetic patients compared to other ARBs or ACE inhibitors, though clinical evidence for its preclinical pleiotropic cardiometabolic benefits is currently lacking.
Supports AZL-M preference for BP control in hypertensive diabetics; extends ARB evidence with confirmed safety.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension related cardiovascular (CV) complications could be amplified by the presence of metabolic co-morbidities. Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is the eighth approved member of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), a drug class of high priority in the management of hypertensive subjects with diabetes mellitus type II (DMII). METHODS: Under this prism, we performed a systematic review of the literature for all relevant articles in order to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and possible clinical role of AZL-M in hypertensive diabetic patients. RESULTS: AZL-M was found to be more effective in terms of reducing indices of blood pressure over alternative ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with minimal side effects. Preclinical studies have established pleiotropic effects for AZL-M beyond its primary antihypertensive role through differential gene expression, up-regulation of membrane receptors and favorable effect on selective intracellular biochemical and pro-atherosclerotic pathways. CONCLUSION: Indirect but accumulating evidence from recent literature supports the efficacy and safety of AZL-M among diabetic patients. However, no clinical data exist to date that evince a beneficial role of AZL-M in patients with metabolic disorders on top of its antihypertensive effect. Further clinical studies are warranted to assess the pleiotropic cardiometabolic benefits of AZL-M that are derived from preclinical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Georgiopoulos et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: